Aquarionics

Monday 7th June 2004

PFd4-II - The Perils of Supporting Rulesets

On not using licensed stuff

I’ve been asked if PFd4-II is going use any rulesets. The answer is no. Up until today, that was because I don’t really want to make it specific to any ruleset, because it means storing specific information about specific characters – INT, STR, DEX etc – and their equipment and what’s being worn and everything, and all of this has to be rewritten completely for every different ruleset.

Sod that for a game of tactical warfare.

My other stated reason for this was that I doubted that the various producers of rulesets would be terribly happy about an application that allowed you to play without the core rules books. I was then reminded that the D20 system is released under the OGL which might allow me to do this.

I checked the FAQs – it’s too early in the decade to wade though legal documents – and discovered:

Q: So what kinds of programs can I make with the OGL?
A: Anything. Character generators are popular, as are programs that help GMs keep track of their adventure. Random treasure generators are also fun.

Q: So I could make a game?
A: Sure. Remember though, you cannot use any Product Identity with the OGL or claim compatibility with anything. So you can’t say your game is a d20 System game or uses D&D rules or call it ‘Elminster’s Undermountain Crawl’.

Yay cool, I can use the rules to make a game. Except, hang on a second:

Q: Why can’t I use those things in my program?
A: No d20 System Product can include rules for character creation or applying experience. In exchange for using the d20 logo you are prohibited from making a product that replaces the core rulebooks. Covered Products supplement the core rulebooks; they may not replace them. That is why all Covered Products must state that they require the use of the core rules.

So, I can make a game with the D20 ruleset, but I can’t actually use the phrase “D20” to describe it. Therefore I’m not allowed to say “PFd4-II supports D20!” even if it does.

In fact, on top of this:

Q: What is different if I use the d20 System License?
A: [...] This includes the obvious examples of attacking in combat, saving throws, and skill checks, but also includes dice rolling for character ability scores and hit points and rolling for damage. Why? Because in the d20 System a higher number is almost always better. Rolling an 18 for strength is obviously a preferable outcome to rolling a 3. In any circumstance where one outcome is quantifiably better than another is considered by Wizards to be an indication of success or failure; the software cannot perform these kinds of operations without breaching the license.

This means if I want to use the D20 name, I can’t actually say “You: 19, Enemy: 5, You hit” unless I pay the license fee because that’s how D20 works, but if I didn’t say it was D20, I could show the working.

So that’s the other reason I’m staying clear of labeled rulesets, they make my brane hurtz.

Those who spoke on this:

gravatar image

Phil Ulrich:

2004-06-07 16:01 3 hrs after the Original Article

The OGL, honestly, is a hideous piece of crap. Basically, you’re allowed to make new stuff for a D20 game (expansions and whatnot), and then really only if you pay WotC for licensing fees. It was a nice overture, but largely empty.

Incidentally, you aren’t the same Aquarion who plays B Nomic, are you?

Comment Link

gravatar image

Aquarion:

2004-06-07 16:40 39 mins after Phil Ulrich

Yup, That Aquarion

Comment Link

gravatar image

Senji:

2004-06-09 14:56 2 days after Phil Ulrich

In much the same way as I’m the same Senji as the Wild Card who used to play B Nomic….

Comment Link


Nicholas 'Aquarion' Avenell is a web developer in London, you can find out more about him or how to get in touch.

There are more Articles, Projects, Journal Entries, Photographs and things that defy description here, too.

If you're looking for something specific, there are Calendar & Category -based lists of everything.

And if you want to follow stuff that appears here, try a Syndication Feed, or the generic Feed of everything.

Aquarionics on Livejournal


Aquarion [updating]
Twitter last updated


More Journal:

[RSS Icon]
[ESF Icon]
[CDF Icon]

That which is relevant:


Explain Ads
© 2000 to 2008 inclusive Nicholas Avenell
All comments are the property of their creators, published with permission
(Unless otherwise indicated, the opinions and sentiments expressed on this site are those of the author and not of any organisation of which he is an affiliate, including his employer. Caveat Lector, E&OE. sigh)
0.215 seconds, 22 queries, 2.67Mb on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:11:08 +0000
Generated by Epistula Version 2.0.3