The Forest, Edward Rutherfurd
Edward Rutherfurd is an author with a specialised genre all of his very own. He writes historical fiction which follows a place though the people who live there. ‘The Forest’ is a novel about the New Forest, as told though the stories of the families of Cola the Huntsman, The Prides, Furzeys, Grockletons, Puckles and so on from the founding of the Forest in William the Conquerors’s time, right down to the present day. From the killing of King Rufus (who died in the New Forest) though to the trial of Alice Lisle, down to the family politics of Jane Austin’s Bath, this is an epic tale which manages to wind together the past, present and future, pulling the reader slowly though the family trees and then swiftly though the fights, arguments and feuds of the families and the forest they have made their home.
If it has a fault, it is that the structure of the book (each chapter is a new generation, though not necessarily the generation after the one you last saw, and gaps of hundreds of years are not uncommon) lends itself to a slightly fractured plot-line, though Rutherfurd’s sense of narrative continuity means that the gaps between the stories are never too shear, or that a somewhat distanced narrative can occasionally make character motivations a mystery (Though this works both ways, it’s never obvious when a character’s mind is being opaqued deliberately), or a tendency towards slow movement as the setup for the new generation is explained.
The Forest is an excellent book by a master of narrative, but the structure might be a little strange and distracting to some readers. Nevertheless, it’s definitely worth reading especially if you have read, and enjoyed, previous works by the Author
Ailbhe:
Heh. The thing which annoyed me most is that I’m used to reading historical fiction by people who are experts in their period, and it’s easy to see that he isn’t an expert in any of the periods he covers. This was particularly annoying for the Austen / Heyer period, of which I have read a helluva lot.
But it’s an ok book. I preferred London, probably because I knew less of the history.
Aquarion:
Well, his next book is ‘dublin’. Make of this what you will…
Richard Clay:
I disagree. His research was excellent, enough to make every period he covered very plausible. I found it a tremendous read, far better than “OK” !!