NNTP Licence
Subject: Re: [I] Prob'ly a stupid question...From: Aquarion
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
On 23 May 2002 19:58:40 GMT, dicconf@radix.net (Richard Eney) wrote:
>In article
>Kevin Hackett
>
>>Cheers,
>> Kevin
>>I reserve intelligible copyright on these opinions
>
>What does "intelligible copyright" mean?
This post is licenced for dissemination to other news servers by means of the NNTP protocol as defined in RFCs 977 and 2980 provided it is quoted in whole or with minimal modifications as required by the specifications above, the content of this post may - in whole or in part - be reproduced under "fair use" for replys to this article, appling recursivly to enable this article to be quoted in future articles in this thread including, but not limited to, quotations used in the future refering to this topic and the thoughts expressed within it. Permission is also granted to store this article for public retrieval on the condition it remains attributed and unmodifed except as explained above, unless this post contains the header "X-NO-Archive" (case insensitive). The copyright of all original portions of this document remains with the poster as identified above, portions of the entire article may be copyrighted to another party, all trademarks that may be referenced are also acknowleged. Furthermore, all contact data contained in this post (including email addresses) is licenced for use only for correspondance, the 'harvesting' of this address for marketing purposes is strictly prohibbited. Each indervidual charector as an ascii stored bit may be reside in memory belonging to the owner of hardware, in which case the legal responsibility of this article, including deletion if found inflamitory can I stop doing this now or is anyone still reading this far, I mean it started off well, but I can't really go on typing this stuff, can I? eventually it turns into something like the default text for MS Publisher files, lorum ipso decoum est ipso lurmo groucho foo bar baz and indeed frek blah blah every alternate tuesday blur, blah blah blair blair thatcher gosh politics in a thread that could spell danger, it would probably be best if I stopped doing this now before I spend the next several lines going zootle wordle, so I conclude with the facts that portions of this document are invalid where void, and most of it should not be taken as legal in any way unless you really really want to get into all sorts of trouble, but the important thing is that the end of this must have LOTS AND LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS ABOUT THE "CONSUMER" HAVING ACCEPTED THIS LICENCE THE MOMENT THEY KNEW THE SOFTWARE EXISTED AND NOBODY HAVING ANY RIGHTS TO EVEN READ THIS LIENCE, CONTENTS VOID WHERE PROHIBITED, MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF NUTS.
![[RSS Icon]](/assets/images/buttons/rss2.gif){kind=small}
![[ESF Icon]](/assets/images/buttons/esf.gif){kind=small}
![[CDF Icon]](/assets/images/buttons/cdf.gif){kind=small}